Impact assessments for AI

FRIA and DPIA consultant for AI systems

For organisations deploying AI in decision-making, HR, education, credit, public services or other sensitive contexts.

Zahed combines GDPR/DPIA thinking with AI Act risk, FRIA structure and practical governance.

First step

The intake shows whether your question is mainly about inventory, classification, FRIA/DPIA, vendor evidence, Article 4 evidence or governance.

When this matters

AI affects individuals or groups
There is profiling, ranking or assessment
A supplier provides insufficient impact information
Legal asks for DPIA, FRIA or fundamental rights analysis

Approach

1

Context and role

We determine use case, affected persons, role allocation, data and decision impact.

2

Risk analysis

We assess privacy, bias, transparency, human oversight, appeal options and fundamental rights.

3

Measures

We translate risk into controls, documentation, supplier questions and governance.

What you get

DPIA/FRIA boundaries
Risk and mitigation matrix
Supplier questions
Human oversight plan
Decision note for legal or leadership

FAQ

When do I need a FRIA?

A FRIA is especially relevant for certain high-risk AI systems, public contexts and situations affecting fundamental rights. The exact duty depends on system, role and context.

What is the difference between DPIA and FRIA?

A DPIA focuses on privacy risk under the GDPR. A FRIA looks more broadly at fundamental rights in the AI Act context. AI projects often require both to be considered together.

Discuss your situation

If the intake shows that guidance is needed, we schedule a conversation. We then look at what is happening, what is urgent and which first step makes sense.

Schedule a call