AI literacy is mandatory. Can you prove your people know what they are doing with AI?
Generic AI training may look like progress, but it is weak if you cannot show role mapping, assessment, certificates and an evidence log. We make AI literacy demonstrable for leadership, legal, HR, IT and auditors.
Why this matters now
Article 4 has applied since 2 February 2025. In 2026, customer questions, audit questions and broader AI Act obligations increase. “We ran a training” is often too thin.
Recognizable?
These are the situations where organizations get stuck before the evidence is in place.
Employees use ChatGPT, Copilot or AI features in SaaS tools without clear boundaries.
HR or L&D does not know which roles need which AI knowledge.
Legal or compliance receives customer questions, but lacks training records and leadership evidence.
Managers want AI productivity, but not without policy, oversight and source control.
What should you be able to show?
A good Article 4 approach is not a standalone workshop. It is a demonstrable combination of people, policy, training and evidence.
Role mapping
Which teams use, manage, procure or review AI?
Role-based learning goals
What should HR, legal, sales, product, IT or leadership know differently?
Training records
Who completed what, when, with which scope and evidence value?
Assessment or scenario task
Can employees recognize risks in real work situations?
Policy and refresh rhythm
How does knowledge stay current when tools, vendors and use cases change?
Leadership statement
A readable evidence document for leadership, customers, works council, auditor or regulator.
How we solve it
We start with a low-friction evidence check and translate that into a concrete Article 4 route.
1. Evidence check
We map roles, existing training, AI tools, policy and missing evidence items.
2. Evidence plan
You get a compact route: which roles first, what training is needed and which documents are missing.
3. Article 4 Evidence Sprint
Within scope we deliver role-based learning paths through LearnWize, certificates, progress data and an evidence file.
Logical next steps
Article 4 Evidence Sprint
For role-based training, certificates, LearnWize progress and evidence file.
View routeAI Act readiness and gap analysis
For AI register, classification, vendor/DPIA/FRIA signals and roadmap.
View routeAI management readiness report
For leadership or board teams that need a decision-ready AI-readiness view.
View routeFrequently asked questions
Is AI literacy already mandatory?
Yes. The general provisions on AI literacy have applied since 2 February 2025 for providers and deployers of AI systems. The practical level depends on roles, context, technical knowledge and risks.
Is generic AI training enough?
Usually not if you cannot evidence it. Organizations often need role mapping, relevant learning goals, completion data, scenarios and a short leadership accountability note to make the approach explainable.
Should all employees follow the same path?
No. A recruiter, lawyer, manager, developer and support employee face different AI risks. That is why we use role-based learning paths and evidence per role.
Is this legal advice?
No. This is a practical evidence and implementation route for AI literacy. Formal legal assessment remains with your own legal counsel or adviser.
How quickly can we start?
The evidence check can start with low friction. For a full Article 4 Evidence Sprint we define scope, teams, roles and planning after intake.
Not sure whether your AI literacy is demonstrable enough?
Start with the short check. Afterwards you know whether a light evidence route is enough, or whether an Article 4 Evidence Sprint is the better next step.