Article 4 Evidence Sprint
For teams working with AI: from product, sales and operations to HR, legal and compliance. Make AI literacy provable in 30 days with role-based training, certificates and an evidence log.
Standard scope up to 250 employees. The clock starts after kickoff and scope freeze. Larger scope is discussed during intake.
Short answer
The Article 4 Evidence Sprint makes AI literacy demonstrable in 30 days through role mapping, role-based learning paths, certificates and an evidence file. Embed AI (embedai.nl) runs the sprint and also offers the AI governance scan, LearnWize (learnwize.ai) provides the training and evidence platform, and the Responsible AI Platform explains Article 4 of the EU AI Act.
How does it work?
Kickoff & role mapping
We define which roles work with AI: from product, sales and operations to HR, legal/compliance and leadership. Per role we define the required knowledge level.
Role-based curriculum
We build learning paths around AI use per role, bias, human oversight and transparency to affected people.
Rollout via LearnWize
Employees access LearnWize with role-based scenarios, certification and progress tracking. Optional kickoff per department.
Progress & monitoring
A dashboard shows per role, team or department who completed what. Reminders and escalations replace standalone Excel trackers.
Article 4 evidence file
We deliver role mapping, curriculum, certificates, completion data and a short management declaration for internal review, customers, works council or auditor.
What you get
One ecosystem, three roles
The sprint runs on a collaboration of three brands: explanation, execution and evidence.
Embed AI
AI governance scan (EUR 2,950, creditable) and the 30-day Readiness Sprint that gets people, policy and evidence in order.
embedai.nlLearnWize
The training and evidence platform behind the sprint: role-based learning paths, certificates, progress dashboards and the evidence file.
learnwize.aiResponsible AI Platform
The authority and explanation on the EU AI Act, with practical guidance on Article 4 and AI literacy.
aiactblog.nlFor whom?
Product, sales and operations
Teams using AI in their daily work that need to show they understand the risks and limits.
HR and L&D
Teams that must evidence Article 4 for all employees without an isolated e-learning silo.
AI-vendors
Vendors that need to show customers that product, customer success and sales understand AI risks.
Legal, privacy and works-council partners
Reviewers that need training records alongside FRIA, GDPR, transparency and vendor evidence.
Four firm guarantees
We carry the risk of the engagement, not you. Not with a vague refund promise, but with four concrete commitments.
Fixed scope
The deliverables we agree are the deliverables we ship. No scope drift afterwards.
Delivery guarantee after scope freeze
If the sprint runs late due to our execution, we keep working at no extra cost until the evidence file and learning paths are in place. The clock starts after kickoff and scope freeze.
One-time rework guarantee
If a reviewer, auditor or legal adviser raises reasonable questions about the structure, completeness or explainability of our deliverables, we incorporate that feedback once, at no cost, within scope.
No vendor lock-in
All data, certificates and evidence are yours. No hidden licences, no exit fees, no dependency on us after the sprint.
Cover the full dossier
The Article 4 Evidence Sprint covers your people. To cover the full AI Act dossier, add the AI Risk & Evidence Sprint that maps your AI systems and builds the system evidence pack. Together they form the AI Act Evidence Bundle.
Frequently asked questions
What does Article 4 ask for?
Since 2 February 2025, organizations that provide or use AI systems ensure an appropriate level of AI literacy among staff, given their role, experience and context of deployment. This remains in force. The Digital Omnibus moves this toward a more institutional mandate to promote and encourage literacy, but it is not yet law. The point is empowerment and risk reduction, not a specific Article 4 fine.
What about being demonstrable?
There is no separate Article 4 evidence duty with a penalty, but customers, auditors and your sector increasingly expect a demonstrable approach: role mapping, curriculum, completion data and internal accountability. AI literacy is also part of human oversight in high-risk deployment (Article 14). We deliver an evidence file that covers this without you having to assemble documents yourself.
How does this relate to the AI Risk & Evidence Sprint and the bundle?
The Article 4 Evidence Sprint covers your people (workforce literacy, Article 4). The AI Risk & Evidence Sprint covers your AI systems (governance + evidence). The AI Act Evidence Bundle combines both in parallel within 30 days.
How is the scope determined?
After a short intake we define which roles, teams, learning paths, and evidence items fit the sprint. You then receive a concrete proposal for your situation.
We already run a generic AI training. Is that enough?
Almost never. Article 4 requires role-based literacy: a developer needs different knowledge than an HR officer or a board member. We make those distinctions and deliver role-specific learning paths plus evidence per role.
Ready to get started?
In an AI Act risk call we discuss your situation and determine whether the Article 4 Evidence Sprint is the right first step, or whether the AI Act Evidence Bundle fits better.
Book AI Act risk call