Article 4 Evidence Sprint
For teams working with AI: from product, sales and operations to HR, legal and compliance. Make AI literacy provable in 30 days with role-based training, certificates and an evidence log.
Standard scope up to 250 employees. The clock starts after kickoff and scope freeze. Larger scope is discussed during intake.
How does it work?
Kickoff & role mapping
We define which roles work with AI: from product, sales and operations to HR, legal/compliance and leadership. Per role we define the required knowledge level.
Role-based curriculum
We build learning paths around AI use per role, bias, human oversight and transparency to affected people.
Rollout via LearnWize
Employees access LearnWize with role-based scenarios, certification and progress tracking. Optional kickoff per department.
Progress & monitoring
A dashboard shows per role, team or department who completed what. Reminders and escalations replace standalone Excel trackers.
Article 4 evidence file
We deliver role mapping, curriculum, certificates, completion data and a short management declaration for internal review, customers, works council or auditor.
What you get
For whom?
Product, sales and operations
Teams using AI in their daily work that need to show they understand the risks and limits.
HR and L&D
Teams that must evidence Article 4 for all employees without an isolated e-learning silo.
AI-vendors
Vendors that need to show customers that product, customer success and sales understand AI risks.
Legal, privacy and works-council partners
Reviewers that need training records alongside FRIA, GDPR, transparency and vendor evidence.
Four firm guarantees
We carry the risk of the engagement, not you. Not with a vague refund promise, but with four concrete commitments.
Fixed scope
The deliverables we agree are the deliverables we ship. No scope drift afterwards.
Delivery guarantee after scope freeze
If the sprint runs late due to our execution, we keep working at no extra cost until the evidence file and learning paths are in place. The clock starts after kickoff and scope freeze.
One-time rework guarantee
If a reviewer, auditor or legal adviser raises reasonable questions about the structure, completeness or explainability of our deliverables, we incorporate that feedback once, at no cost, within scope.
No vendor lock-in
All data, certificates and evidence are yours. No hidden licences, no exit fees, no dependency on us after the sprint.
Cover the full dossier
The Article 4 Evidence Sprint covers your people. To cover the full AI Act dossier, add the AI Risk & Evidence Sprint that maps your AI systems and builds the system evidence pack. Together they form the AI Act Evidence Bundle.
Frequently asked questions
What exactly does Article 4 require?
Since 2 February 2025, organizations that provide or use AI systems must ensure their staff has sufficient AI literacy, given their role, experience and context of deployment. This applies to all organizations, regardless of risk category.
What about evidence and accountability?
Regulators expect a demonstrable approach: role mapping, curriculum, completion data and internal accountability. We deliver an evidence file that covers this without you having to assemble documents yourself.
How does this relate to the AI Risk & Evidence Sprint and the bundle?
The Article 4 Evidence Sprint covers your people (workforce literacy, Article 4). The AI Risk & Evidence Sprint covers your AI systems (governance + evidence). The AI Act Evidence Bundle combines both in parallel within 30 days.
How is the scope determined?
After a short intake we define which roles, teams, learning paths, and evidence items fit the sprint. You then receive a concrete proposal for your situation.
We already run a generic AI training. Is that enough?
Almost never. Article 4 requires role-based literacy: a developer needs different knowledge than an HR officer or a board member. We make those distinctions and deliver role-specific learning paths plus evidence per role.
Ready to get started?
In an AI Act risk call we discuss your situation and determine whether the Article 4 Evidence Sprint is the right first step, or whether the AI Act Evidence Bundle fits better.
Book AI Act risk call