AI in justice and elections: reliable, explainable and under human oversight
AI that supports judicial authorities or influences electoral behaviour touches the rule of law and is high-risk. We support a careful, transparent and well-documented deployment, with the human in the lead.
Detail per situation
Support of judicial authorities
AI that supports judges or dispute resolution must be reliable and explainable and keep the human decisive. We assess and document that.
Elections and voting behaviour
AI that can influence elections or voting behaviour requires strict transparency and safeguards. We set those up and record them.
Frequently asked questions
Does this also apply to legal-tech vendors?
If your AI supports judicial authorities, you have your own obligations as a provider. We deliver the evidence that buyers need.
How do we keep the human decisive?
By keeping the AI advisory, making decisions reviewable and recording the human role. We set up that process.
Sources and status
The legal background and sources for this topic live on Responsible AI Platform, the knowledge layer on the EU AI Act.
Read the background on Responsible AI Platform