Risk scoring
AI estimates risk of re-offending or incidents.
Annex III point 6
AI in law enforcement requires extra care around legal basis, proportionality, bias, logging and human responsibility.
Risk assessment of natural persons.
Analysis of traits or behaviour.
Assessment of evidence reliability.
Support for detection, investigation or prosecution.
Individual risk scores
Investigation prioritisation
Evidence reliability scoring
Profiling for intervention
Legal basis, necessity and proportionality
Logging and audit trail
Human oversight
False positives and fundamental-rights impact
AI estimates risk of re-offending or incidents.
AI assesses relevance or reliability of evidence.
AI prioritises leads or persons for follow-up.
This page is a practical guide for first classification and preparation. For legal decisions, a full system and context review remains necessary.
Annex III point 4
Could the AI affect a person’s job opportunity, evaluation or working conditions?
High-risk AI in HR and employmentAnnex III point 5
Could the AI make access to an essential service easier, harder or more expensive?
High-risk AI in essential servicesAnnex III point 3
Does the AI support learning, or does it help decide something about a learner?
High-risk AI in educationAnnex III point 1
Can this biometric AI system be used at all, or does a prohibition need to be checked first?
High-risk AI in biometricsStart with the Gap Intake and share which AI systems, suppliers and processes are in scope. Then we can sharpen the classification and first evidence route.