Advisory · roles · evidence

AI literacy advisory that can be acted on

A compact advisory route for organizations that want to know what is needed, which teams should come first and how AI literacy can be made demonstrable.

Why this is not only about knowledge

Article 4 of the EU AI Act has applied since 2 February 2025. Organizations must be able to show that people working with AI have sufficient understanding of AI capabilities, limits and risks. A strong approach combines training with role mapping, assessment, training records and an evidence file.

You know whether training, workshop, course or program fits
There is a priority list per audience
Evidence is included from the start
You can decide on next steps

Fast clarity on what to arrange

Concrete

No abstract policy report, but choices on audiences, sequence, training and evidence.

Risk-based

Teams with sensitive data, customer impact or decision preparation need different attention.

Decision-ready

You receive language and priorities that leadership, HR and compliance can use.

Expertise and method behind this approach

The approach is built from AI governance, EU AI Act implementation and practical training rollout. AI literacy should not become a standalone awareness session, but an explainable combination of roles, risk, learning goals and evidence.

Updated 6 June 2026

Zahed Ashkara

Lawyer, AI governance specialist, Certified AI Compliance Officer and founder of Embed AI.

Roles and risk first

We start with who uses AI, who reviews output, which data is sensitive and where decisions are affected.

Evidence from day one

Training, assessment, certificates, records and leadership summary are built into the same route.

What you get

Short intake with key stakeholders
Analysis of current AI use and existing training
Advisory note with priorities and scope
Recommended training formats per audience
Evidence and record advice for Article 4
Follow-up advice for policy, implementation or Evidence Sprint

When this fits

For decision-making

When management needs to know how much approach is needed and where to start.

For HR and L&D

When training ideas exist, but scope, audience and evidence are unclear.

For legal and compliance

When Article 4 needs to become workable internal requirements.

Who this fits

Organizations in the starting phase

For teams without a complete AI literacy program yet.

HR and L&D

For owners of training, onboarding and certificates.

Compliance and privacy

For teams explaining how AI use is controlled.

Board or MT

For decisions on budget, scope and sequence.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between advisory and consultancy?

Advisory is more compact and decision-focused. Consultancy also supports setup and implementation.

Can this be a standalone session?

Yes. For some organizations an advisory call with a short note is enough to choose the right route.

Do we receive a report?

You receive a practical advisory note or leadership summary, depending on scope.

Can you implement afterwards?

Yes. Advisory can move directly into implementation, training or an evidence file.

Want to make AI literacy demonstrable?

Book a short call. We define which format fits your audience, risks, existing training and evidence needs.

Rivium Westlaan 46, Capelle aan den IJsselCoC 90283597